|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Where
will your next tipping pad be located?
There are many things to consider when determining the optimized filling sequence for a landfill. There is no universal equation that shows how to sequence phases. Sequencing is based on a combination of economics, aesthetics, and practical judgment in regards to access, drainage, leachate control, and minimized soil handling. Planning PeriodDeveloping an optimized set of landfill sequence plans requires a two-step approach. First, we identify where the site headed in the long term. This information is included in the long-term landfill sequence plan. Second, we identify in detail what will be done in the short-term to reach the long-term goals. This information is provided by a detailed annual access plan. Both the long-term and short-term plans consider five main areas of operations, however the short-term plan allows for more detailed planning like placement of tipping pads and soil stockpiles. Each of the five main areas which are addressed in the fill sequence plan will receive varying amounts of detail, depending on the site conditions. These five main areas include:
EconomicsEconomy of Scale Time Value of Money Access
DrainageNo matter what part of the landfill you are working on, it must drain properly. This means water must be collected and handled efficiently without eroding or weakening other structures - all at the lowest cost. When preparing drainage plans, we prefer to work backwards, from the final (end of site) development plan to the present. This insures that the interim drainage structures we build today, will work toward and connect to the final, permanent structures for the site. Evacuation Soil Handling Evacuation Sequence In order to minimize excavation costs, every haul road should be designed to provide the quickest possible cycle times. Because of the time value of money, the best way to sequence the excavation is to make the shortest cycles first, postponing the longer cycle times until later. Filling Effect on Cost When sizing the filling phases, the first priority is to provide enough fill capacity to last until the next phase is constructed. Once the minimum size of each phase has been determined, the most economical size for each phase (based on the site's required fill capacity) can be determined.
The economic effect of various closure schedules presents two conflicting concerns: the time value of money and financial assurance. Based on the time value of money concept, it would be best to delay spending money on closure for as long as possible. The amount of financial assurance is based on the largest area of the landfill which will ever require closure, however. So delaying the cost of closure basically increases the amount of financial assurance which must be provided. In terms of leachate minimization, it is generally best to cap portions of the site as soon as possible to limit the amount of infiltration which can cause leachate. Most landfills are designed to drain properly at closure. However, it is important that interim drainage be given adequate attention as well. Are your landfill operations going as smoothly as you would like? Do you know what big projects are approaching and how you are going to complete them? The following list describes some of the sequence plans we have created for others. Perhaps you're landfill would benefit from having a set of "optimized" fill sequence plans.
|
|||||||||||||||||